© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The Cisco Systems logo is seen as part of a display at the Microsoft Ignite technology conference in Chicago

(Reuters) – Acacia Communications (NASDAQ:) Inc said on Friday it has terminated a merger deal with Cisco Systems Inc (NASDAQ:) that had agreed to buy the optical component maker for $2.84 billion, after it failed to obtain regulatory approval from China.

The merger, initially expected to close in the second half of Cisco’s full-year 2020, was cleared by the United States, Germany and Austria, but had been under regulatory review by China, the only remaining closing condition of the deal.

Acacia said of Friday the deal was unable to receive approval from Chinese government’s State Administration for Market Regulation within the timeframe contemplated by the merger agreement.

Shares of network gear maker Cisco were down about 1% in trading before the bell.

The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Cisco in 2019 agreed to buy Acacia in cash, as it sought to garner a bigger chunk of 5G spending by telecom companies. Cisco has said it may dispute the optical gear maker’s right to terminate the merger agreement, Acacia added.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *